Who is the Client in Family Law Client Attorney Privilege?
When you talk with your family law attorney about your case, you may be asking yourself, “Is there attorney-client privilege?” The answer is yes, but you should be aware of the circumstances that can void this privilege. As a client, your attorney and you may not want to discuss certain details, such as the date of the wedding. Fortunately, most attorneys must maintain the attorney-client privilege, so there’s no reason to be shy about discussing the details of your case.
Exceptions to attorney-client privilege
Fortunately, there are a few situations where you can lose the attorney-client privilege. These situations typically involve the death of a client or the expiration of a corporation. If these situations occur, however, the attorney-client privilege will still apply. The exceptions to the privilege are not very common and can include situations where the client’s assets are sold or the company is absorbed by another corporation.
The main purpose of attorney-client privilege is to encourage full disclosure, which is necessary for effective representation. Attorney-client communication must take place between the attorney and the client, and it cannot involve a third party. In addition, the attorney-client privilege does not apply to a third party who is not an attorney. Thus, if you do share the information with a third party, you are waiving the privilege.
Waiver of privilege
While the attorney-client privilege is generally protected in all cases, it can sometimes be waived. For instance, in certain situations, the attorney can reveal confidential communications to a third party. For instance, the family law attorney can reveal confidential information to a third party if they believe the other person is about to commit a crime. However, there are some circumstances in which the attorney cannot waive this privilege. One example of a situation where a third party may be able to waive the privilege is if there is an imminent threat of child abuse or domestic violence.
Whether or not a party has waived the privilege of privileged communications is a legal question. If a person waives the privilege, it is generally based on their good faith. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure reference this exception in sub. (b)(3). In this case, the attorney may disclose privileged communications in the course of litigation. A client attorney’s privilege is not revoked if he or she is genuinely under the impression that the communication was confidential.
Protection against disclosure of information
In the course of litigation, parties may communicate with third parties. For example, an estate agent may value a family home, a pension specialist may advise on the best investment path, and accountants may disentangle complicated business assets. Additionally, parties may seek the services of witnesses to testify at a final hearing. Despite its broad application, litigation privilege is not absolute. As recent events show, there are many exceptions to this general principle.
In some instances, a lawyer may consult with two clients on the same issue, even if they are in different jurisdictions. In such cases, the communication is not protected by the attorney-client privilege. For example, the case between Oink and Porker, who were both represented by Attorney Hayman, may not be privileged, and the contents of these communications may be admissible in evidence.
(For more articles like this, click here: How to Respond to Divorce Papers Without an Attorney?)